介绍 |
玉焰/桃色陷阱 Jade.1995.BluRay.1080p.DTS.x264-CHD 8.7GB永垂不朽自由自在劫取生辰纲6. 瞩目远方,你才会加快步伐;观赏风景,你才会步履轻盈;结伴同行,你才能欢歌笑语;风雨兼程,你才能成功登顶。我同桌非常欣赏我流利的英语,他的称赞也经常使我很受鼓舞。fluent English 流利的英语;encouraged 受到鼓舞的辛弃疾319.稻花香里说丰年,听取蛙声一片。《西江月》
【影片原名】Jade
【中文译名】玉焰/桃色陷阱
【出品公司】Paramount Pictures
【出品年代】1995
【上映日期】1995年10月13日 美国
【影片级别】USA:R
【IMDB链接】http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113451
【IMDB评分】4.8/10 (5,058 votes)
【国 家】美国
【类 别】动作/犯罪/惊悚/剧情
【导 演】William Friedkin
【主 演】David Caruso...David Corelli
Linda Fiorentino...Trina Gavin
Chazz Palminteri...Matt Gavin
Richard Crenna...Gov. Lew Edwards
Michael Biehn...Bob Hargrove
Donna Murphy...Karen Heller
Ken King...Petey Vesko
Holt McCallany...Bill Barrett
David Hunt...Pat Callendar
Angie Everhart...Patrice Jacinto
Kevin Tighe...Dist. Atty. Arnold Clifford
Robin Thomas...Mr. Green
【内容简介】
戴维.科雷里是旧金山的地方检察官,他正在侦办一件凶杀案。在发案现场他找到多个精致的小盒子,里面都是女人的物件并附有写字的纸条,其中一个用中文写着“玉 字。通过周密的调察,疑点逐渐集中到一个叫特莉娜的女人身上,而这个女人正是他过去的旧情人。特莉娜的丈夫马特是一位律师,刚好也是检察官大学时代的好友。在这种友情、爱情、利弊得失交织的复杂关系中,主人公该如何是好呢?担任《教父》监制的罗伯特.埃文斯,《本能》的编剧乔.埃斯特拉斯,加上本片的导演,三人组合本身就很吸引人。
Someone does a nasty hatchet job on a San Fransisco big noise and the Assistant D.A. takes charge of the investigation. Through a web of blackmail and prostitution involving the Governor, an old lover of the law man emerges as a prime suspect and he has to deal with his personal feelings as well as the case.
Jade.1995.BluRay.1080p.DTS.x264-CHD
RELEASE DATE....: 04/3/2010
THEATRE DATE....: 1995
iMDB URL........: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0113451
iMDB RATiNG.....: 4.8/10 5,058 votes
GENRE...........: Action/Crime/Drama
SOURCE TYPE.....: Blu-Ray AVC 1080p
ViDEO BiTRATE...: x264 @ 11645 Kbps
FRAME RATE......: 23.976 fps
AUDiO 1.........: ENG DTS-HD MA CORE 1536 Kbps
RUNTiME ........: 01:34:45 (h:m:s)
ASPECT RATiO....: 1.778: 1
RESOLUTiON......: 1920 X 1080
SUBTiTLES.......: N/A
FilE SiZE.......: 8.7G
RECODE RiPPER...: chp@CHD
须信鸾弦易断,奈云和再鼓,曲中人远。认罗袜无踪,旧处弄波清浅。青翰棹舣,白蘋洲畔,尽目临皋飞观。不解寄、一字相思,幸有归来双燕。林表明霁色,城中增暮寒。电影下载,MP4下载,高清电影,电影排行榜,电影票房It would be possible (natural / reasonable) to think (believe / take the view) that…, but it would be absurd (wrong) to claim (argue) that … |