毕莹的《倾销--反倾销法抑或竞争法》从历史渊源出发，跟随反倾销制度的发展，探究其长久以来“不证自明”之前提的真实性——“倾销有害”，在明确其与竞争法的相关性后，结合传统的和新的“重度使用反倾销者”两方面实践，以比较的方法全面探讨将“倾销”置于竞争法而非反倾销法之下的优势，同时梳理及剖析反对该取代的主要理由。

本次版本为全英文版，适合从事相关研究工作的人员参考阅读。

毕莹的《倾销--反倾销法抑或竞争法》从历史渊源出发，跟随反倾销制度的发展，探究其长久以来“不证自明”之前提的真实性——“倾销有害”，在明确其与竞争法的相关性后，结合传统的和新的“重度使用反倾销者”两方面实践，以比较的方法全面探讨将“倾销”置于竞争法而非反倾销法之下的优势，同时梳理及剖析反对该取代的主要理由。最终得出：以世界贸易组织《反倾销协议》为基准的各国反倾销规则应最终为日益发展并相互融合的各国竞争规则以及有关掠夺性价格歧视的国际统一竞争协议所取代。为逐步达到该目标，更多的可行性方案应自双边和区域展开。

Chapter 1 Time to Reexamine Dumping: Antidumping Law or Competition Law

1.1 Overview of Antidumping Law

1.1.1 The Etymology of "Dumping"

1.1.2 Legislative Development of Antidumping: Domestic to International

1.2 The Proliferation of Antidumping laws and Actions

1.2.1 The Proliferation of Antidumping laws

1.2.2 The Proliferation of Antidumping Actions

1.2.3 New Features of Antidumping Application

1.3 The Problem of Antidumping Law

1.3.1 "Protectionist Abuse" Criticism

1.3.2 Tariff - Like Barrier

1.3.3 "Attractive Features" for Protectionism

1.4 "Antidotes" to Prevent Protectionist Abuse

1.4.1 Further Refining

1.4.2 Reform by Competition

1.5 Antidumping: Time to Go Back to Basics

Chapter 2 Dumping in Economic Theories and Antidumping Law

2.1 Dumping in Economic Theories

2.1.1 The Traditional Dumping Theory of Viner

2.1.2 The Modern Dumping Theory of Willig

2.1.3 Generally Recognized Harmful Dumping:Predatory Dumping

2.2 Dumping in the Original Antidumping Law

2.2.1 The U.S.1894 Wilson Act

2.2.2 The U.S.1916 Antidumping Law

2.2.3 The U.S.1921 Antidumping Law

2.2.d Antidumping laws in Other Countries

2.2.5 Antidumping: Anti Cross-border Predatory Price Discrimination

2.3 Dumping in the International Antidumping Agreement

2.3.1 GATT/WTO: Standardizing Antidumping Law

2.3.2 Basic Common Requirements on Dumping

2.3.3 "Dumping is Harmful" : Self-evident Premise

2.4 Summary

Chapter 3 Predatory Price Discrimination in Economic Theories and Competition Law

3.1 Predatory Price Discrimination in Economic Theories

3.1.1 Price Discrimination: Primary-line and Secondary-line Competition

3.1.2 Predatory Pricing

3.2 Overview of Competition Law

3.2.1 Consensus on the Basic Competition Principles

3.2.2 Predatory Price Discrimination

3.3 Predatory Price Discrimination in Competition Law

3.3.1 Competition Rules and Cases in the U.S.

3.3.2 Competition Rules and Cases in the EU

3.3.3 Basic Common Requirements on Predatory Price Discrimination

3.4 Summary

Chapter IV Duraping: Antidumping Law or Competition Law

4.1 Less Protectionist Abuse in Competition Law

4.1.1 Objectives: Less Susceptible to Protectionism

4.1.2 Basic Substantive Rules: Predatory Pricing v. Healthy Competition

4.1.3 Basic Procedural Rules: Less Discretion in Implementations

4.1.4 Remedies : More Effective in Preventing Reoccurrence

4.2 Competition Law in Line with the Free Trade Framework

4.2.1 Integration of Trade and Competition Principles

4.2.2 Avoidance of conflict with Basic Trade Principles

4.2.3 Avoidance of Anti-competitive Effects

4.3 Empirical Evidence Supporting the Substitution by Competition Law

4.3.1 Rarely Overlap in Practice : Typical Cases

4.3.2 Antidumping Cases under Competition Criteria

4.4 Dumping: Competition Law instead of Antidumping Law

4.4.1 More Meticulous in Each of the Basic Elements

4.4.2 More Consistent with Basic Modern Trade and Competition Principles

4.4.3 Less Protectionist Abuse in Practice

Chapter V Difficulties of Substitution in Practice

5.1 Difficulties in respect of Antidumping

5.1.1 "Maintaining Multilateral World" and "vel Playing Field".

5.1.2 "Predatory Pricing" and "Monopolizing Dumping"

5.1.3 "Predatory Pricing" to "Protection from Foreign Competition"

5.1.4 Alleged Different Objectives : "Unfair Trade" and "Quasi Safeguard" .

5.2 Difficulties in respect of Competition

5.2.1 Lack of Domestic Competition Law

5.2.2 Lack of International Agreement for Enforcement

5.3 Alleged Difficulties Cannot Prevent Substitution

5.3.1 Neither "Unfair trade" nor "Quasi Safeguard" is the Goal of Antidumping

5.3.2 Competition is Gradually Developed to Substitute Antidumping

Chapter VI The "Substitution" Debate and the New Users

6.1 Linkage between Antidumping and Competition

6.1.1 Overview of the New Users

6.I.2 Brazil

6.1.3 India

6.1.4 South Africa

6.1.5 The Other New Users

6.2 Antidumping Practice in China

6.2.1 Development of Antidumping Legislation

6.2.2 Legislative Goal of Antidumping Regulation

6.2.3 Requirements on "International Dumping"

6.2.4 Features of Antidumping Cases in China

6.3 Competition Practice in China

6.3.1 Development of Competition Legislation

6.3.2 Legislative Goals of Competition Law

6.3.3 Requirements of "Domestic Dumping"

6.4 Linkage between Antidumping and Competition in China

6.4.1 Common Legislative Goal and Legal Terminology

6.4.2 Comparison of the Requirements of "Dumping"

6.4.3 Comparison in the Modern World

6.4.4 Antidumping Cases under Competition Requirements

6.4.5 Difficulties of Substitution in China

6.4.6 China and the "Substitution" Debate

Chapter VII Time to Reexamine Dumping: "Trust Antitrust to Dump Antidumping"

Conclusion

Appendix List of Chinese Antidumping Cases(1997-2010)

Bibliography