This Norton Critical Edition of the At)ologia stresses the literary,, humanistic, and religious power of the text, Newman's personal development, and the progress of the Oxford movement, teprinted is a definitive text,which reached its final form about 1886 and incorporates all of Newman's later changes. Extensive notes are provided.
"Basic Texts of the Newman-Kingsley Controversy" enables students to see the AFologia by setting it against other important documents in the Newman-Kingsley controversy. Included in the book are correspondence, Kingsley's pamphlet "What, Then, Does I)r. Newman Mean?," Newman's pamphlets "Mr. Kings- ley's Mode of Disputation" and "True Mode of Meeting Mr.Kingsley," and Newman's two Appendices of 1866.
Foreword
A Note on The Text
A Newman Chronology
The Text of Apologia Pro Vita Sua
Basic Texts of the Newman-Kingsley Controversy
Mr. Kingsley and Dr. Newman: A Correspondence on the Question Whether Dr. Newman Teaches That Truth is No Virtue?
Charles Kingsley: What, Then, Does Dr. Newman Mean?
John Henry Newman: Mr. Kingsley's Method of Disputation True Mode of Meeting Mr. Kingsley
Newman's Two Appendices of 1866
Origin and Reception of the Apologia
Martin J. Svaglie·Why Newman Wrote the Apologia
John Henry Newman·Letter to Canon Flanagan, 1857
Walter E. Houghton·The Issue Between Kingsley and Newman
Vincent Ferrer Blehl·Early Criticism of the Apologia
Essays in Criticism
Lewis E. Gates·Newman as a Prose-\\Vriter
Walter E. Houghton·Style and the Dramatic Re-creation of the Past
Martin J. Svaglic·The Structure of Newman's Apologia
Robert A. Colby·The Poetical Structure of Newman's Apologia pro Vita Sua
Robert A. Colby·The Structure of Newman's Apologia
pro Vita Sua in Relation to His Theory of Assent
Leonard W· Deen·The Rhetoric of Newman's Apologia
David J. DeLaura·Newman's Apologia as Prophecy
Bibliography